Monday, June 1, 2020

2020 District Attorney Race


While there are still many more issues to add to this blog , I want to weigh in on the District Attorney race for the 4th Judicial District.  

My recommendation for this important position is Michael Allen.  You can read his comprehensive qualifications for this position  here .  

At the time Mark Waller was serving in the Colorado House of Representatives, I was deeply involved in observing the voting records of members of the Colorado House and Senate to determine which Senators and Representatives truly stood for Personal Freedom and Liberty.  

That site shows the voting history for each year, broken down into seven categories.

Mark Waller's score during those years was:
2011 #16   Overall Score  67%     "D"
2012  #13  Overall Score 83%      "B"
2013  #22  Overall Score 63.5%  "D"
2014  #17  Overall Score 60.1%  "D-"

The percentages, 13%,16%,17%,22% show the legislators' votes in relation to each other.  Mark Waller's scores were most consistently low on Personal Responsibility, Fiscal Responsibility and Equal Protection/Rule of Law.

Finally, I am concerned that Mark Waller's commitment to the Taxpayers' Bill of Rights (TABOR) may not be as strong as it should be.  I say this because TABOR requires an understanding of Limited Government, and I do not see that in his voting record.
2011 58%
2012 76%
2013 64%
2014 68%

My vote will enthusiastically go for Michael Allen 

See Debate between Allen and Waller at Church for All Nations, here

Honorable Dave Schultheis
Former Colorado State Senator, SD9

Monday, October 14, 2019

2019 Voting Recommendations

As I have done for several years, I realize how important it is to vote...and vote intelligently.  It is difficult to completely understand each of the issues before the voters, so where one is not totally clear, I suggest that effort be made to find a person whose voting pattern is based on principles that are consistent with your's.  

As a member of the Colorado Assembly in both the House and Senate I am asked by many to give my recommendations.  They are always based on principles codified in the U.S. and Colorado Constitutions to the best of my ability.  Individual freedom and liberty are essential to good governance and harmony.

Recommendations regarding Municipality Candidates are not listed.

CAUTION:  Ballot issues that in any way promote the retaining of current taxes that were scheduled to expire should always be voted NO.   It is a common ploy of government to further the tax income, once it is put in place.  Any issue that begins with the words "WITHOUT RAISING TAXES..." should be an immediate flag that existing taxes scheduled for termination should be allowed to lapse because they are, in effect, raising taxes.

A Few Principles to Ponder before you vote

  1. Government does not need more for the foreseeable future.
There is not one government agency or public organization funded by taxpayer money that operates without significant waste either in-house or by dishonest people. 

      2. Government's need for growth is unceasing.

There is not one government organization that does not want to increase it size, influence or power;  it is the nature of government, and it needs your money to do so. 

     3.  The more Government grows, the less freedom and liberty is available to the individual.

Increased taxes limits the individual's ability to spend his/her money as he/she chooses.

Two Statewide Measures are on the November 5th 2019 Ballot.  

Voters should be extremely careful in analyzing the effects of these two issues because if passed  they will have long-term, negative consequences.

Vote NO on Proposition CC 
Credit for the following response goes to Centennial Institute:

Proposition CC (Retain Revenue for Transportation and Education TABOR Measure)
Prop CC permanently repeals the Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR) tax refund to 
Colorado citizens. It is an effort to grow the Colorado government and weaken TABOR by 
eliminating the cap on taxpayer revenue the state can keep. Current law requires the state of  Colorado to return any money to Colorado citizens collected above its budget. Colorado politicians would like to keep this money for other projects, outside of the state’s current budget. Colorado’s government does not have a revenue problem, it has a spending problem. In fact, the state of Colorado’s budget grows by $1 billion every year. Rather than adequately budgeting its record income, Colorado politicians want more taxpayer dollars. Every family in Colorado lives within a budget, so should the state of Colorado.

Vote NO on Proposition DD
Credit for this response goes to Sen. Kevin Lundberg

Proposition DD (Legalize Sports Betting with Tax Revenue for Water Projects Measure)
DD, creates unlimited sports betting in Colorado.  It is being billed as a tax on casinos to make more money for water projects.  This too is deceptive, for the tax is for a new form of gambling in Colorado and unlike previous legalized gambling in the state, this has no limits on the size of the bets.  This betting will also be conducted online, making it available everywhere, and possibly becoming the biggest gambling industry in the state.

The gambling that is currently allowed in Colorado is strictly limited in many ways, including location and the size of the bets.  Proposition DD radically departs from this limited policy on gambling in our state.  Additionally, gambling inevitably becomes a heavy tax on those who can least afford it.  Proposition DD is not a good choice for state policy or government revenue. 

El Paso County Commissioner, District 2:

Either of the following two candidates deserve to be elected.  Unfortunately, only one can be elected to this vacancy.  Both hold similar view on limited government, freedom, TABOR and strong unwavering conservative principles.

I have followed Gordon Klingenschmitt's voting record in the Colorado House of Representatives and know that he is a true warrior who is not reluctant to stand firm in the face of strong political headwinds. 
  • Carrie Geitner
  • Gordon Klingenschmitt
School Board Candidates:  
In addition to viewing the candates's website or Facebook, check Vote411
Each candidate should have to articulate how he/she views HB19-1032

Municipality Measures
City of Colorado Springs Ballot Issues:
2B  Vote NO.  It IS a $7 million tax increase
2C  Vote NO.  It IS a 5-yr. tax increase

Friday, September 1, 2017

Goals of the Radically-Progressive Organization, Together Colorado Springs, to make the city the most progressive city in the country

Together Colorado Springs
Kicked off Feb 2017: Guest Speaker Mayor Suthers.  Several hundred attendees.
Board members
Dawn Halliburton-Rudy – Co-Chair: Homeless Advocate, NAACP, Cahir Civic Engagement & Voting Rights
Greg Walta – Co-Chair-
Jane Ard Smith; Lawyer, Chair Sierra Club Peak Region
Todd Luce: Luch Research.
Polling (Gen Pop/Institutional) - Voter ID/Contact/GOTV - Data Collection - Research and Analysis
Bobby Mikulas; Businessman
Ahriana Platten: From her website: experiential theologian, business strategist
Becca Sickbert: Marketer
John Weiss:
Founder of Indy

Mission Goals from website:
Close Drake Power Plant
Citizenship for illegals
Kill Tabor
Increase City Council Pay and run candidates (website takes credit for the flip in COS council last election).
Goals stated during a meeting attended by a source
Make COS the “most progressive city in the country”.
Major push to turn out the vote in southeast part of COS. They believe they can control any vote if they can mobilize that section of city.
Increase Council pay to 68K to attract more candidates they want to elect.
Will work mission goals through city ballot initiatives push southeast COS to tip vote.
Obtain a local radio station by bankrupting it or obtain other radio station to target southeast part of COS. Use Together Colorado Springs 501s  to run a format of hip hop music and local leftist news and talk programming to help indoctrinate southeast side into a voting block. 
 Board member bragged they have up to 500k to run candidates and push initiatives.
A check of TRACER shows no issue committee by the name of Together Colorado Springs. Together Colorado TRACER check showed expenditures of 87.8K with $82.5K going to CO Families for a Fair Wage.
Aligned with Emerge Colorado: Sister org to 22 other state chapters. Mission:

Monday, November 21, 2016

It Wasn't an Election, It was a Revolution, by Daniel Greenfield

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.

  This wasn’t an election. It was a revolution.

It’s midnight in America. The day before fifty million Americans got up and stood in front of the great iron wheel that had been grinding them down. They stood there even though the media told them it was useless. They took their stand even while all the chattering classes laughed and taunted them.

They were fathers who couldn’t feed their families anymore. They were mothers who couldn’t afford health care. They were workers whose jobs had been sold off to foreign countries. They were sons who didn’t see a future for themselves. They were daughters afraid of being murdered by the “unaccompanied minors” flooding into their towns. They took a deep breath and they stood.   They held up their hands and the great iron wheel stopped.

The Great Blue Wall crumbled. The impossible states fell one by one. Ohio. Wisconsin. Pennsylvania. Iowa. The white working class that had been overlooked and trampled on for so long got to its feet. It rose up against its oppressors and the rest of the nation, from coast to coast, rose up with it.

They fought back against their jobs being shipped overseas while their towns filled with migrants that got everything while they got nothing. They fought back against a system in which they could go to jail for a trifle while the elites could violate the law and still stroll through a presidential election. They fought back against being told that they had to watch what they say. They fought back against being held in contempt because they wanted to work for a living and take care of their families.

They fought and they won.

This wasn’t a vote. It was an uprising. Like the ordinary men chipping away at the Berlin Wall, they tore down an unnatural thing that had towered over them. And as they watched it fall, they marveled at how weak and fragile it had always been. And how much stronger they were than they had ever known.

Who were these people? They were leftovers and flyover country. They didn’t have bachelor degrees and had never set foot in a Starbucks. They were the white working class. They didn’t talk right or think right. They had the wrong ideas, the wrong clothes and the ridiculous idea that they still mattered.

They were wrong about everything. Illegal immigration? Everyone knew it was here to stay. Black Lives Matter? The new civil rights movement. Manufacturing? As dead as the dodo. Banning Muslims? What kind of bigot even thinks that way? Love wins. Marriage loses. The future belongs to the urban metrosexual and his dot com, not the guy who used to have a good job before it went to China or Mexico.

They couldn’t change anything. A thousand politicians and pundits had talked of getting them to adapt to the inevitable future. Instead they got in their pickup trucks and drove out to vote.   And they changed everything.

Barack Hussein Obama boasted that he had changed America. A billion regulations, a million immigrants, a hundred thousand lies and it was no longer your America. It was his.

He was JFK and FDR rolled into one. He told us that his version of history was right and inevitable.

And they voted and left him in the dust. They walked past him and they didn’t listen. He had come to campaign to where they still cling to their guns and their bibles. He came to plead for his legacy.   And America said, “No.”

Fifty millions Americans repudiated him. They repudiated the Obamas and the Clintons. They ignored the celebrities. They paid no attention to the media. They voted because they believed in the impossible. And their dedication made the impossible happen.

Americans were told that walls couldn’t be built and factories couldn’t be opened. That treaties couldn’t be unsigned and wars couldn’t be won. It was impossible to ban Muslim terrorists from coming to America or to deport the illegal aliens turning towns and cities into gangland territories.

It was all impossible. And fifty million Americans did the impossible. They turned the world upside down.

It’s midnight in America. CNN is weeping. MSNBC is wailing. ABC calls it a tantrum. NBC damns it. It wasn’t supposed to happen. The same machine that crushed the American people for two straight terms, the mass of government, corporations and non-profits that ran the country, was set to win.

Instead the people stood in front of the machine. They blocked it with their bodies. They went to vote even though the polls told them it was useless. They mailed in their absentee ballots even while Hillary Clinton was planning her fireworks victory celebration. They looked at the empty factories and barren farms. They drove through the early cold. They waited in line. They came home to their children to tell them that they had done their best for their future. They bet on America. And they won.    They won improbably. And they won amazingly.

They were tired of ObamaCare. They were tired of unemployment. They were tired of being lied to. They were tired of watching their sons come back in coffins to protect some Muslim country. They were tired of being called racists and homophobes. They were tired of seeing their America disappear.

And they stood up and fought back. This was their last hope. Their last chance to be heard.

Watch this video. See ten ways John Oliver destroyed Donald Trump. Here’s three ways Samantha Bee broke the internet by taunting Trump supporters. These three minutes of Stephen Colbert talking about how stupid Trump is on the internet. Watch Madonna curse out Trump supporters. Watch Katy Perry. Watch Miley Cyrus. Watch Robert Downey Jr. Watch Beyonce campaign with Hillary. Watch fifty million Americans take back their country.

The media had the election wrong all along. This wasn’t about personalities. It was about the impersonal. It was about fifty million people whose names no one except a server will ever know fighting back. It was about the homeless woman guarding Trump’s star. It was about the lost Democrats searching for someone to represent them in Ohio and Pennsylvania. It was about the union men who nodded along when the organizers told them how to vote, but who refused to sell out their futures.

No one will ever interview all those men and women. We will never see all their faces. But they are us and we are them. They came to the aid of a nation in peril. They did what real Americans have always done. They did the impossible.  America is a nation of impossibilities. We exist because our forefathers did not take no for an answer. Not from kings or tyrants. Not from the elites who told them that it couldn’t be done.

The day when we stop being able to pull off the impossible is the day that America will cease to exist.  Today is not that day. Today fifty million Americans did the impossible.

Midnight has passed. A new day has come. And everything is about to change.

  “Tolerance is the last virtue of a dying society.”   Aristotle

Sunday, August 9, 2015

E-voting: A reckless threat to voter privacy and election security

Thanks to legislation sponsored by Senator Owen Hill and Representative Dan Nordberg out-of-state military voters and overseas civilians will now have greater access to securely exercising their right to vote in their hometown elections with extended time to return their mail ballots. However, after tense negotiations just before House Bill 1130’s final passage, a bipartisan committee rejected Internet voting for municipal elections. Despite a unanimous House vote for Internet voting, and ignoring Secretary of State Wayne Williams’s unwise support for email voting, the legislature ultimately and wisely rejected Internet transmission of voted ballots in municipal elections.

As a former state legislator, my committee assignments included hearings that limited Internet voting in 2006. Observing escalating cyber-security risks since then, I was shocked this spring when the House supported Internet voting and Senate Republicans, who ultimately stopped the effort, had such difficulty doing so. Secretary Williams, in lobbying for email balloting, assured lawmakers that it would be secure and “The concern that the system is hackable is a nonstarter….” Security experts, legislators, and voters were baffled by Williams’s stance, given the frequent headlines of Internet and email hacking.

After Williams’s failed legislative effort to apply Internet voting to municipal elections, he moved to then expand email voting for military and overseas voters in federal and state elections by using his purported rule-making authority. Critics allege that he exceeded his authority because the rule conflicts with the legislative intent to strictly limit the use of email voting to extenuating hardship circumstances, as agreed in the legislative hearings. In the 2011 hearings, Secretary Gessler testified that email ballots would not be accepted.  But Williams would seemingly give “convenience” for voters and election officials preference over election security, accuracy, and election integrity.

Most Americans desire enthusiastic voter participation, but making convenience a major goal is certain to undermine the security and verifiability of elections. Not voting is a wise, legitimate choice for those who are not engaged and have not studied the candidates or issues. Our state’s push to force-feed ballots to all voters via mandatory mail ballots and Internet schemes risks canceling out the legitimate votes of eligible, informed voters. Internationally-known election experts John Fund (National Review Online) and Hans von Spakovsky (Heritage Foundation) have called out Colorado and Secretary Williams to their national audiences for this wrong-headed expansion of Internet voting.

With significant numbers of military voters, Colorado Springs and El Paso County are tempting targets for purveyors of Internet voting schemes. Continuing vigilance by local voters and governing boards is required to curtail abuses and risks. In the 2013 recall election, Williams, then clerk of El Paso County, supported a temporary election rule to permit email voting for all absentee voters because all-mail balloting could not be used for that election. Fortunately, the public outcry helped defeat that proposed rule.

Colorado Springs municipal elections now appear to encourage any out-of-state military member or dependent to vote by email, whether or not postal mail is available. With the passage of HB1130, Colorado Springs can implement early ballot mailing times and permit military and overseas voters to vote by email ballot only in truly extenuating circumstances. I urge voters to halt convenience email voting.

In addition, Colorado should ban the state’s privacy-invading online application that voters’ privacy by capturing the voter’s identity and votes. Unbeknownst to most voters who vote by email, their private choices are collected by a commercial vendor, defying secret ballot laws. The opportunities for abuse of this data are alarming and could place an entire election in question.

The situation is likely to require legislation or litigation to stop Secretary Williams on this ill-advised path that puts military and overseas votes and election results at needless risk. In the meantime, voters should insist that county clerks honor the lawmakers’ stated intent to limit Internet/email voting. Hard-won voting rights should never be compromised or subject to tampering at the hands of malicious hackers.

Protect your vote by challenging your county clerk to obey the clear intent of the law, and put voting integrity ahead of convenience and budget considerations. Finally, urge your legislator to introduce and/or support 2016 legislation to curtail the use of Internet/email voting.

Former state Sen. David Schultheis, R–Colorado Springs, served in the General Assembly from 2001 to 2010 and was a member of the 2006 House State, Veterans, and Military Affairs Committee, which conducted hearings on Internet voting.

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Log Cabin Republicans denied booth at Texas GOP Convention

What did the Texas GOP convey to the Log Cabin Republicans when asked to have a booth at the 2014 Texas GOP Convention?

We affirm that the practice of homosexuality tears at the fabric of society and contributes to the breakdown of the family unit.  Homosexual behavior is contrary to the fundamental, unchanging truths that have been ordained by God, recognized by our country's founders, and shared by the majority of Texans.  Homosexuality must not be presented as an acceptable  'alternative' lifestyle, in public policy, nor should "family" be redefined to include homosexual 'couples.'  We believe there should be no granting of special legal entitlements or creation of special status for homosexual behavior, regardless of state or origin.  Additionally, we oppose any criminal or civil penalties against those who oppose homosexuality out of faith, conviction or belief in traditional values."